Direct Indexing vs. ETFs

An important question investors face today is whether to build a portfolio through direct indexing or rely on the traditional route of exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Both strategies can offer broad market exposure, but the way they achieve this — and the level of customization they allow — differ significantly.

Direct indexing gives investors the ability to purchase individual stocks that make up an index, allowing for increased personalization and tax management opportunities. ETFs, on the other hand, package those same stocks into a single investment vehicle, offering convenience and diversification, limiting the need for constant oversight.

Whether direct indexing vs. ETFs will be right for you often depends on your financial goals, investment experience, and tolerance for investment risk. In this article, we’ll break down how these strategies differ, explore who might benefit from each, and discuss how Avidian Wealth Solutions can help guide you toward a well-structured plan that aligns with your long-term goals.

What is the difference between direct indexing and ETFs?

While both strategies are designed to give you exposure to a specific index, their structures and benefits are not the same. Direct indexing means buying the actual securities of an index individually, whereas ETFs bundle those securities into a single share.

Here’s a quick comparison:

	Direct indexing	ETFs
Ownership	Individual stocks of an index	A fund that holds a basket of securities
Diversification	Matches chosen index but with customization	Broad diversification in one purchase
Risk level	Depends on chosen customizations	Lower (risk spread across holdings)
Costs	Potentially higher trading costs, lower ongoing fees	Lower trading costs, but expense ratio applies
Control	Full customization (exclude or overweight specific stocks)	Limited — you own ETF shares, not individual securities
Tax treatment	Allows tax-loss harvesting at stock level	Limited — tax treatment applies to ETF as a whole
Management	Requires oversight (often tech-enabled)	Professionally managed, often passively

Both options help achieve index-like exposure, but direct indexing offers more flexibility, while ETFs emphasize simplicity.

Learn more about the difference between individual bonds and bond funds

What is an example of direct indexing?

Direct indexing typically replicates a broad market index, such as the S&P 500, by directly owning its constituent stocks. Instead of buying an S&P 500 ETF, you would own a portfolio of the 500 companies themselves.

For example, let’s say you want exposure to the S&P 500 but don’t want to invest in certain industries — such as fossil fuels or tobacco. With direct indexing, you can exclude those companies and still hold the rest of the index. You might also overweight industries you feel strongly about, such as renewable energy or technology.

Direct indexing platforms often use software to make the process manageable, automating trades and tax strategies while giving you final control over which stocks you hold.

Is direct indexing worth it?

Direct indexing may be particularly attractive if:

• You want personalization: Investors who care about social impact investing factors — environmental, social, or governance (ESG) — may prefer to remove certain companies from an index.
• You have significant taxable assets: Direct indexing makes it easier to harvest tax losses at the individual stock level, potentially reducing your overall tax bill.
• You seek control: Some investors prefer tailoring their exposure, overweighting industries they believe in and underweighting those they don’t.

However, direct indexing can be more complex than simply buying an ETF. It requires more transactions, may involve higher upfront costs, and often works best for investors with larger portfolios.

For individuals seeking customization and tax efficiency — and who are comfortable with additional complexity — direct indexing can be a compelling choice.

What is an ETF?

An exchange-traded fund (ETF) is a pooled investment vehicle that holds a collection of assets — such as stocks, bonds, or commodities — designed to track a particular index, sector, or theme. ETFs trade on exchanges like stocks, which means you can buy and sell them throughout the trading day.

For example, instead of buying individual shares in 500 different companies, you could purchase one ETF that tracks the S&P 500. This single purchase offers exposure to the broader U.S. market, saving you the effort and possible expense of buying each security separately.

Advantages of ETFs

ETFs have become increasingly popular because they combine the best of mutual fund diversification with the flexibility of stock trading. Their advantages include:

• Diversification in one purchase: By holding a basket of securities, ETFs spread risk across multiple investments.
• Lower cost: ETFs generally come with low expense ratios, making them cost-efficient compared to mutual funds or multiple direct purchases.
• Liquidity: ETFs can be traded any time the market is open, providing flexibility.
• Transparency: Most ETFs disclose their holdings daily, so you know exactly what you’re investing in.

What is the downside of ETFs?

Despite their advantages, ETFs aren’t perfect. Some drawbacks include:

• Lack of direct ownership: When you buy an ETF, you own a share of the fund, not the individual companies inside it. This means you don’t get voting rights or dividends directly from those companies (though ETFs may distribute dividends).
• Market risk remains: While ETFs reduce concentration risk, they don’t eliminate broader market volatility. If the overall index falls, the ETF usually follows.
• Potentially low returns: Some ETFs hold hundreds or even thousands of securities. While this lowers risk, it can also dilute returns if too many underperforming assets are included.
• Management fees: Although typically low, ETFs do charge an ongoing expense ratio that direct investors don’t face.

For investors who are looking for simplicity and access to entire markets, ETFs often make sense. But for those who want more control or concentrated stock exposure, direct indexing may be preferable.

Direct Indexing vs. ETFs: final considerations

Both strategies have merit depending on your goals:

Direct indexing works best for…	ETFs are well-suited for…
Investors who value personalization, want to manage taxes at a granular level, and have the portfolio size to support the added complexity.	Investors who want simple, cost-effective exposure to a market or sector without the need to manage individual securities.

It doesn’t always have to be one or the other. Many investors combine both strategies — using ETFs for broad market exposure and direct indexing for specific areas where customization or tax planning makes sense.

Ready to add professional guidance to your portfolio? Let’s talk.

Choosing between direct indexing vs. ETFs is more than a matter of preference; it’s about creating a plan that aligns with your long-term financial future. The good news? You don’t have to make these decisions alone.

At Avidian Wealth Solutions, we work with individuals and families in Houston, Austin, Sugar Land, and The Woodlands to structure portfolios tailored to their financial goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. Whether your interests lean toward active, direct indexing, or you’d prefer the diversification and simplicity of ETFs,our team can provide guidance to help evaluate which approaches may be appropriate based on your circumstances and objectives.

If you’re ready to take the next step toward a more thoughtful investment approach, contact Avidian Wealth Solutions today.

More Helpful Articles by Avidian: 

• Why Business Owners Need Tax Contingency Plans
• What the End of Step-Up in Basis Could Mean for Your Heirs
• The Difference Between a GRAT and IDGT Trust
• The Top 10 IRA Rollover Mistakes
• Using an Intra-Family Loan for Tax-Efficient Wealth Transfer

---

Please read important disclosures here